• Users Online: 294
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 92-97

Stented versus nonstented open pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children


Pediatric Surgical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Akram M Elbatarny
MD, MRCSEd, 41 El Shorbagy St., Crossing with Ghayath Eldin St., Tanta 31111
Egypt
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1110-1415.143555

Rights and Permissions

Purpose The aim of the study was to compare the short-term results of stented versus nonstented open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty regarding operative time, hospital stay, functional outcome, and complications. Patients and methods Twenty-seven pediatric open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasties were performed for primary pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) by a single team at a single institution from November 2009 to October 2012. Preoperative investigations included renal function tests, urine microscopy, culture, and sensitivity, renal ultrasonography, and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA). Patients were simply randomized into two groups: group I, the stented group (either nephrostent or JJ stent), and group II, the nonstented group. Outcome was analyzed with respect to operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative effect on hydronephrosis, and postoperative differential renal function (DRF). Minimal follow-up was 6 months. Results This study included 27 pediatric patients with primary PUJO, 14 patients in group I and 13 patients in group II. The mean age was 5.7΁2.6 years. Twelve (44.4%) cases were right sided and 15 (45.6%) were left sided; no bilateral cases were present. The mean DRF preoperatively was good in both groups (37.5% for group I vs. 35.6% in group II). There was no significant difference in operative time between both groups. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stented group, but this was mainly related to postoperative care policy in both groups. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the complication rate. Postoperative DRF as well as hydronephrosis were significantly improved in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion The use of stents in pyeloplasty is not justified as a routine. The overall success and complication rates are independent of whether or not to drain or of the method of drainage. Therefore, it seems that the choice depends on local circumstances and surgeon preference. A larger number of patients is needed to validate these results.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2520    
    Printed66    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded190    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal