|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 127-133
SYNTAX score II as a predictor of incomplete ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous intervention
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt
|Date of Submission||18-Apr-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||28-May-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||19-Jan-2017|
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, 31111
Background Incomplete ST-segment resolution (STR) is a marker of impaired myocardial perfusion and adverse clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery score II (SS-II) has been developed combining anatomical and clinical variables. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the SS-II as a predictor of incomplete STR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with PPCI.
Patients and methods The present study prospectively included 100 patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. SS-II was determined in all patients. The sum of ST-segment elevation was measured from standard 12-lead ECG obtained on admission and from a second ECG recorded 60 min after PPCI. STR resolution was defined as either complete (≥50%) or incomplete (<50%). Patients were divided into two groups according to STR: patients with complete STR (positive STR) were 76 in number (76%) and patients with incomplete STR (negative STR) were 24 in number (24%).
Results Patients in the negative STR group were older, had higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease, lower creatinine clearance (CrCl), higher peak troponin, lower ejection fraction and a higher SS-II (P value = <0.001, 0.018, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001 respectively). Patients in the negative STR group also had a longer time to reperfusion (P=0.016) and higher prevalence of myocardial blush grade 0/1 (P=0.016 and <0.001, respectively). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, SS-II was an independent predictor of incomplete STR (odds ratio=0.224, 95% confidence interval, 0.209–0.778, P=0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified SS-II greater than 25 as the best cutoff value predictive for incomplete STR with a sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 73.9%, and area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 79.2.
Conclusion SS-II is an independent predictor of incomplete STR in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, st-segment resolution, SYNTAX score II
|How to cite this article:|
Naseem M. SYNTAX score II as a predictor of incomplete ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous intervention. Tanta Med J 2016;44:127-33
|How to cite this URL:|
Naseem M. SYNTAX score II as a predictor of incomplete ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous intervention. Tanta Med J [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 29];44:127-33. Available from: http://www.tdj.eg.net/text.asp?2016/44/3/127/198656
| Introduction|| |
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred treatment modality for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) because it achieves rapid and complete reperfusion of an infarct-related artery .
Despite restoration of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, some patients may have impaired microvascular and myocradial perfusion and poor prognosis ,,,.
ST monitoring after reperfusion therapy is a simple, noninvasive and readily available method for evaluation of the efficacy of reperfusion therapy ,,,. Lack of ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) on ECG is considered as a marker of impaired myocardial reperfusion and adverse clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction .
The SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score has been shown to be predictive of clinical outcome in different clinical settings in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ,,,,,,,.
The major limitation of the SYNTAX score is the lack of inclusion of clinical variables. Patients with equivalent scores may have different clinical outcomes because of the presence of different comorbidities .
The SYNTAX score II (SS-II) has been recently developed and incorporates both clinical and anatomical variables; thus, it may ensure a better prediction of the clinical outcome in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) .
The aim of this study was to evaluate the SS-II as a predictor of incomplete STR in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI.
| Patients and methods|| |
One hundred consecutive patients with recent first STEMI who underwent PPCI in the Cardiology Department of Tanta University were prospectively included in the study from June 2014 until August 2015.
The study inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) confirmed first acute STEMI based on the presence of typical anginal pain more than 30 min, new ST-segment elevation at J point in two or more contiguous leads greater than or equal to 0.2 mV, and elevation in troponin or ck-MB; (b) onset of symptoms less than 12 h before hospital admission; and (c) TIMI flow 3 and less than 30% residual lesion at the occluded site at the end of the procedure.
The exclusion criteria were presence of left or right bundle branch block and other conduction abnormalities, and presence of a permanent pacemaker.
Coronary angiography and PCI were performed following the femoral approach. All patients received the following regimen: (a) clopidogrel 300–600 mg loading dose orally, followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg/day; (b) aspirin 300 mg followed by 81–325 mg/day; and (c) unfractionated heparin (100 IU/kg) during the procedure; the dose was reduced to 70 IU/kg in case of administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide).
TIMI flow rate  was assessed before and at the end of PPCI. Myocardial blush grade (MBG)  was also assessed at the end of the procedure.
The use of manual thrombus aspiration was left to the operator’s discretion.
Standard 12-lead ECG was obtained on admission and a second ECG was recorded 60 min after PPCI. ST-segment elevation (in mm) was measured 20 ms after the J point. The sum of ST-segment elevations was calculated in leads I, aVL, and V1 through V6 for anterior infarctions and in leads II, III, aVF, V5, and V6 for nonanterior infarctions. STR was defined as percentage reduction in the sum of ST-segment elevation from admission ECG to that on the second ECG. STR was defined as complete (≥50%) or incomplete (<50%) ,,. Accordingly, patients were divided into two groups: patients with complete STR (positive STR) and patients with incomplete STR (negative STR).
Determination of the SYNTAX score II
The baseline SYNTAX score was computed from the diagnostic coronary angiogram. Each significant coronary lesion (defined as stenosis diameter ≥50% in vessels with minimum diameter ≥1.5 mm) was scored . The SS-II combines two anatomical variables (anatomical SYNTAX score and unprotected left main CAD) and six clinical variables [age, creatinine clearance (CrCl), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD)]. SS-II was calculated using an SS-II nomogram as previously described .
CrCl was measured using the Cockcroft and Gault  formula. COPD was defined according to the EuroSCORE definition as the long-term use of bronchodilators or steroids for lung disease . PVD was defined as the presence of aorta and arteries, other than coronaries, with claudication, history of previous revascularization surgery, reduced or absent pulse, or the presence of angiographic stenosis of more than 50% or combinations of these criteria .
Echocardiography was performed according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography using the commercially available GE Vivid 7 echocardiograph (General Electric, Norway) with a 2.5 MHz transducer, and left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated using the biplane Simpson method .
Informed consent was taken from all patients and the study was approved by the local ethical committee.
All statistical studies were carried out using the statistical package for social sciences (18.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Quantitative variables are expressed as mean±SD. Qualitative data are expressed as counts and percentages. The Student t-test and the χ2-test were used to compare quantitative and qualitative values, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of incomplete STR. The receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to detect optimal cutoff values of SS-II for predicting incomplete STR. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
One hundred patients with recent first STEMI who underwent PPCI were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to STR. The positive STR group included 76 patients (76%) and the negative STR group included 24 patients (24%).
Baseline clinical characteristics
There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, family history of premature CAD, BMI, prevalence of COPD, and Killip class on admission. Patients in the negative STR group were older, had higher prevalence of PVD, lower CrCl, higher peak troponin, lower ejection fraction, and a higher SS-II (P<0.001, 0.018, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively, [Table 1]).
There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the number of diseased vessels, rate of stent utilization, infarct-related artery, reference vessel diameter, stent length, stent diameter, rate of use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, rate of use of thrombus aspiration device, or TIMI flow rate before PPCI. The time to perfusion was significantly longer in the negative STR group (P=0.016). MBG was significantly different between the two groups with higher prevalence of MBG 0/1 in the negative STR group, P<0.001 ([Table 2]).
A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify the independent predictors of incomplete STR. The SS-II (odds ratio=0.224, 95% confidence interval, 0.209–0.778, P=0.001) and the time to reperfusion (odds ratio=0.457, 95% confidence interval, 0.119–0.655, P=0.038) were independent predictors for incomplete STR ([Table 3]). ROC curve analysis identified SS-II greater than 25 as the best cutoff value predictive of incomplete STR with sensitivity 79.2%, specificity 73.9%, and area under ROC curve 79.2 ([Figure 1]).
|Table 3: Multivariable logistic regression analysis to detect independent predictors of incomplete STR|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Receiver operating curve characteristic (Roc) curve analyses for SYNTAX score II as predictor for incomplete ST-segment resolution.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The present study evaluated the ability of the SS-II to predict incomplete STR in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI.
The main findings of the present study were as follows. (a) Incomplete STR occurred in 24% of patients with STEMI treated with PPCI despite achievement of TIMI 3 flow. (b) Patients with incomplete STR were older, had higher prevalence of PVD, lower CrCl, higher peak troponin, lower ejection fraction, longer time to reperfusion, and higher incidence of MBG 0/1. (c) The multivariable logistic regression model identified SS-II and time reperfusion as independent predictors of incomplete STR. (d) ROC curve analysis revealed that SS-II greater than 25 had a sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 73.9%, and area under the ROC curve of 79.2 for predicting incomplete STR.
It has been demonstrated that patients with STEMI who have successful epicedial flow restoration may have impaired perfusion at the tissue level . Different techniques have been used to assess myocardial perfusion, such as myocardial contrast echocardiography , nuclear imaging , magnetic resonance imaging , intracoronary Doppler flow wire , and multidetector computed tomography .
STR is a simple bedside ECG sign for assessing tissue-level reperfusion after both thrombolytic therapy and mechanical reperfusion ,. Patients with incomplete STR have a larger final infarct size, lower LVEF, and poor clinical outcome compared with those who achieve complete STR ,. In the present study patients with incomplete STR also had lower LVEF.
The anatomical SYNTAX score was developed as a part of the SYNTAX trial aiming to help clinicians quantify the severity of CAD and choose the best revascularization strategy in patients with complex CAD ,,,,. The major limitation of the SYNTAX score is the lack of inclusion of clinical variables . The SS-II was developed incorporating both anatomical and clinical variables for better prediction of the clinical outcome and more accurate decision making in the management of patients with CAD .
Campos et al.  studied the long-term mortality of 3896 patients undergoing PCI (n=2190) or CABG (n=1796). The SS-II had a better predictive accuracy for long-term mortality compared with the anatomical SYNTAX score. In addition, the SS-II surpassed the anatomical SYNTAX score in discriminating between CABG and PCI.
Salvatore et al.  evaluated the SS-II in acute coronary syndrome patients with that in patients with severe CAD (three-vessel disease and/or left main involvement). The presence of left main disease and SS-II greater than or equal to 29 were the only predictors of clinical outcome at 1 year.
Xu et al.  prospectively collected the data from 1528 consecutive patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI. In this group of patients, the SS-II was a useful tool to risk-stratify patients and predict adverse outcome, including mortality.
The different components of the SS-II are associated with adverse clinical outcome .
Previous studies demonstrated that more diffuse and severe CAD with higher anatomical SYNTAX score was associated with no-reflow in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. In 669 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PPCI, Magro et al.  found that the SYNTAX score was an independent predictor of no-reflow. The study identified SYNTAX score greater than 21 as the best cutoff value increasing the risk for no-reflow. Similarly, Şahin et al.  in a study of 880 patients with STEMI treated with PPCI reported that SYNTAX score with a cutoff value of 19.75 was an independent predictor of no-reflow.
Age has been demonstrated as an independent predictor of mortality .
In a cohort of 11 774 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, including ST and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina, Santopinto et al.  reported that admission CrCl is an independent predictor of hospital mortality and major bleeding. Impaired renal function has been also associated with markers of inflammation and impaired endothelial function .
Several reports demonstrated the relation between PVD and CAD ,. Matsuzawa et al.  reported a relation between peripheral vascular endothelial dysfunction and coronary microcirculation.
LVEF is a known predictor of adverse clinical outcome in patients with STEMI . In a previous report, Vakili et al.  studied 304 patients with STEMI who had undergone PPCI. The authors reported that LVEF less than or equal to 50% is associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital adverse outcome. In addition, absent STR after PPCI had significantly higher rates in patients with low LVEF.
According to the results of the present study, patients with SS-II greater than 25 may benefit from receiving measures that decrease microvascular damage, such as thrombus aspiration and adjunctive pharmacological agents like glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vasodilators drugs.
Small sample size is considered the main limitation of the study. Therefore, larger-scale studies are required to confirm the value of SS-II in predicting impaired myocardial reperfusion.
| Conclusion|| |
The findings of the present study suggest that SS-II may be a useful predictor of incomplete STR in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361:13–20.
Roe MT, Ohman EM, Maas AC, Christenson RH, Mahaffey KW, Granger CB et al.
Shifting the open-artery hypothesis down stream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:9–18.
Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:281–292.
Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Yu H, Higashino Y, Fujii K et al.
Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 85:1699–1705.
Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T, Hori M et al.
Clinical implications of the ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in perfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93:223–228.
Zencirci AE, Zencirci E, Degirmencioglu A, Karakus G, Ugurlucan M, Gunduz S et al.
The relationship between Gensini score and ST-segment resolution in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Kardiol Pol 2014; 72:494–503.
Brener SJ, Dizon JM, Mehran R, Guerchicoff A, Lansky AJ, Farkouh M et al.
Complementary prognostic utility of myocardial blush grade and ST-segment resolution after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Am Heart J 2013; 166:676–683.
Van’t Hof A, Giannini F, Ten Berg J, Tolsma R, Clemmensen P, Bernstein D et al.
ST-segment resolution with bivalirudin versus heparin and routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors started in the ambulance in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients transported for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the EUROMAX ST-segment resolution substudy. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
Kucia AM, Stewart S, Zeitz CJ. Continuous ST-segment monitoring: a non-invasive method of assessing myocardial perfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2002; 1:41–43.
Buller CE, Fu Y, Mahaffey KW, Todaro TG, Adams P, Westerhout CM et al.
ST-segment recovery and outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial. Circulation 2008; 118:1335–1346.
Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K et al.
The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005; 1:219–227.
Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, Vaina S, Morel MA, van den Brand MJ et al.
Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:1072–1081.
Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:961–972.
Capodanno D, Capranzano P, Di Salvo ME, Caggegi A, Tomasello D, Cincotta G et al.
Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2:731–738.
Kim YH, Park DW, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Yun SC, Kang SJ et al.
Validation of SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score for prediction of outcomes after unprotected left main coronary revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3:612–623.
Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, de Vries T, Morel MA, van Es GA et al.
Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:272–277.
Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Lansky A, Mehran R et al.
Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2389–2397.
Garg S, Serruys PW, Silber S, Wykrzykowska J, van Geuns RJ, Richardt G et al.
The prognostic utility of the SYNTAX score on 1-year outcomes after revascularization with zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents: a substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4:432–441.
Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Siviglia M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Niccoli G et al.
EuroSCORE as predictor of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2009; 95:43–48.
Yadav M, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Madhavan MV, Sanidas E, Kirtane AJ et al.
Prediction of coronary risk by SYNTAX and derived scores: synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1219–1230.
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Ryan KA, Mesley R, Marble SJ et al.
Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000; 101:125–130.
van’t Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation 1998; 97:2302–2306.
Claeys MJ, Bosmans J, Veenstra L, Jorens P, De Raedt H, Vrints CJ. Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST-segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome. Circulation 1999; 99:1972–1977.
Ishii H, Ichimiya S, Kanashiro M, Amano T, Imai K, Murohara T, Matsubara T. Impact of a single intravenous administration of nicorandil before reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2005; 112:1284–1288.
Matetzky S, Novikov M, Gruberg L, Freimark D, Feinberg M, Elian D et al.
The significance of persistent ST elevation versus early resolution of ST segment elevation after primary PTCA. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:1932–1938.
Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A et al.
Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 2013; 381:639–650.
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16:31–41.
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:881–882.
Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier HJ, Schönberger JP et al.
Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1117–1124.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al.
Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18:1440–1463.
Hayat SA, Senior R. Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time? Eur Heart J 2008; 29:299–314.
Kondo M, Nakano A, Saito D, Shimono Y. Assessment of ‘micro-vascular no-reflow phenomenon’ using technitium-99m macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:898–903.
Nijveldt R, Beek AM, Hirsch A, Hofman MB, Umans VA, Algra PR, van Rossum AC. ‘No-reflow’ after acute myocardial infarction: direct visualisation of microvascular obstruction by gadolinium-enhanced CMR. Neth Heart J 2008; 16:179–181.
Claessen BE, Bax M, Delewi R, Meuwissen M, Henriques JP, Piek JJ. The Doppler flow wire in acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2010; 96:631–635.
Ogasawara S, Mukawa H, Sone T, Tsuboi H, Morishima I, Uesugi M et al.
Presence of myocardial hypoenhancement on multidetector computed tomography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction predicts poor prognosis. Int J Cardiol 2015; 184:101–107.
Pepine CJ. Prognostic markers in thrombolytic therapy: looking beyond mortality. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:24–27.
De Lemos JA, Braunwald E. ST segment resolution as a tool for assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:1283–1294.
Dong J, Ndrepepa G, Schmitt C, Mehilli J, Schmieder S, Schwaiger M et al.
Early resolution of ST-segment elevation correlates with myocardial salvage assessed by Tc-99m sestamibi scintigraphy in patients with acute myocardial infarction after mechanical or thrombolytic reperfusion therapy. Circulation 2002; 105:2946–2949.
Morishima I, Sone T, Okumura K, Tsuboi H, Kondo J, Mukawa H et al.
Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse longterm outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:1202–1209.
Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, van den Brand M, Kappetein AP et al.
Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention 2009; 5:50–56.
Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A et al.
Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 2010; 121:2645–2653.
Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Holmes DR Jr, et al.
.. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am Heart J 2006; 151:1194–1204.
Xu B, Généreux P, Yang Y, Leon MB, Xu L, Qiao S et al.
Validation and comparison of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score-II among 1,528 consecutive patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:1128–1137.
Campos CM, van Klaveren D, Iqbal J, Onuma Y, Zhang YJ, Garcia-Garcia HM et al.
Predictive performance of SYNTAX Score II in patients with left main and multivessel coronary artery disease-analysis of CREDO-Kyoto registry. Circ J 2014; 78:1942–1949.
Salvatore A, Boukhris M, Giubilato S, Tomasello SD, Castaing M, Giunta R et al.
Usefulness of SYNTAX score II in complex percutaneous coronary interventions in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016; 28:63–72.
Magro M, Nauta ST, Simsek C, Boersma E, van der Heide E, Regar E et al.
Usefulness of the SYNTAX score to predict “no reflow” in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109:601–606.
Şahin DY, Gür M, Elbasan Z, Kuloğlu O, Şeker T, Kivrak A et al.
SYNTAX score is a predictor of angiographic no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2013; 24:148–153.
Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC et al.
Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:1334–1339.
Santopinto JJ, Fox KA, Goldberg RJ, Budaj A, Piñero G, Avezum A et al.
Creatinine clearance and adverse hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: findings from the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Heart 2003; 89:1003–1008.
Stam F, van Guldener C, Schalkwijk CG, ter Wee PM, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Impaired renal function is associated with markers of endothelial dysfunction and increased inflammatory activity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:892–898.
Gori T, Muxel S, Damaske A, Radmacher MC, Fasola F, Schaefer S et al.
Endothelial function assessment: flow-mediated dilation and constriction provide different and complementary information on the presence of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:363–371.
Kuvin JT, Patel AR, Sliney KA, Pandian NG, Rand WM, Udelson JE, Karas RH. Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1843–1849.
Matsuzawa Y, Li J, Aoki T, Guddeti RR, Kwon TG, Cilluffo R et al.
Predictive value of endothelial function by noninvasive peripheral arterial tonometry for coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2015; 26:231–238.
Ng VG, Lansky AJ, Meller S, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ et al.
The prognostic importance of left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2014; 3:67–77.
Vakili H, Sadeghi R, Rezapoor P, Gachkar L. In-hospital outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to left ventricular ejection fraction. ARYA Atheroscler 2014; 10:211–217.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]